Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8307.1374251582@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | LOCK TABLE Permissions (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions
Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> if (lockmode == AccessShareLock)
> aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> ACL_SELECT);
> + else if (lockmode == RowExclusiveLock)
> + aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> + ACL_INSERT | ACL_UPDATE | ACL_DELETE | ACL_TRUNCATE);
> else
> aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> ACL_UPDATE | ACL_DELETE | ACL_TRUNCATE);
Perhaps it would be better to refactor with a local variable for the
aclmask and just one instance of the pg_class_aclcheck call. Also, I'm
pretty sure that the documentation work needed is more extensive
than the actual patch ;-). Otherwise, I don't see a problem with this.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: