Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen

* Simon Riggs:

> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 15:09 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>
>> the testcase discusses here is indeed CHAR(n) vs. VARCHAR.
>
> OK, thanks for pointing out my error.

But I think your point still makes sense.  Is it really necessary to
determine the unpadded length for a query such as this one?

"SELECT c from sbtest where id between $1 and $2 order by c"

(See the start of the thread.)

--
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99