Re: Search content within a bytea field
От
Florian Weimer
Тема
Re: Search content within a bytea field
Дата
Msg-id
82iqg0w2mo.fsf@mid.bfk.de
Ответ на
Re: Search content within a bytea field (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Search content within a bytea field Damiano Bolzoni <damiano.bolzoni@gmail.com>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Sylvain Leroux <sl20@wanadoo.fr>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Sylvain Leroux <sl20@wanadoo.fr>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Damiano Bolzoni <damiano.bolzoni@gmail.com>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Damiano Bolzoni <damiano.bolzoni@gmail.com>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: Search content within a bytea field Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: Search content within a bytea field dmp <danap@ttc-cmc.net>
* Tom Lane: > The JDBC environment behaves differently because setString and so on > do not produce unmarked literals --- there's an implicit cast to > some datatype. So you have to make sure you've picked a > parameter-setting function that is reasonably compatible with the > intended operation. You can append "?stringtype=unspecified" to the JDBC URL, and you get bevahior which matches more closely what other (non-Java) interfaces do. > This is a good thing, really; it tends to keep the system from > choosing an unexpected operation. It more or less prevents use of fancy types. There doesn't seem to be to set an unspecified type on a per-parameter basis, unfortunately. -- Florian Weimer BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления