Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
| От | Florian Weimer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 82fwe0z7wr.fsf@mid.bfk.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq (Alex Shulgin <ash@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Alex Shulgin: >> It's ugly, but it's standard practice, and seems better than a separate >> -d parameter (which sort of defeats the purpose of URIs). > > Hm, do you see anything what's wrong with "?dbname=other" if you don't > like a separate -d? It's not nice URI syntax, but it's better than an out-of-band mechanism. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: