"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>> "Can't run Postgres securely" would be a more-than-sufficient
>> reason not to support NT4, IMHO.
> It could still be run on NT4 under the following conditions:
> 1) Running as a service
> 2) Running if the user logged in is not an administrator.
Well, isn't "running as a service" sufficient? I thought that was the
only interesting case for non-hackers anyway.
As long as you get an error message that's reasonably clear about what
you can do instead, this hardly seems like a showstopper...
regards, tom lane