Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held

daveg <daveg@sonic.net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 06:25:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ...  But maybe it'd be interesting for Dave to stick a
>> LockReleaseAll call into ProcKill() and see if that makes things better.
>> (Dave: test that before you put it in production, I'm not totally sure
>> it's safe.)

> Re safety, what is the worst case here? 

I think a failure would be pretty obvious --- if it gets through
regression tests it's probably fine.
        regards, tom lane