Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 progress

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >       I was only proposing the additional week because I thought there
> > was something still open 'non-Purify' related that was to be addressed...
> >
> >       ...is this not the case?  If its only the Purify stuff that is
> > being the basis...forget it :)  As I stated before, we've been unPure
> > for, what, 6 releases now?  A start has been made, but it is *not* something
> > that should hold back a release...
> >
> >       ...so, unless there are any outstanding issues that should be
> > resolved, let's continue with the June 6th release...
>
> OK, I agree.  I have heard people complaining about excessive memory
> problems under 6.1.  Hopefully, they were inaccurate, or the problem
> will be found by Friday.

I can recall only 'order by' problem, but it's fixed already.

Vadim

------------------------------