Re: Re: [HACKERS] random() function produces wrong range
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [HACKERS] random() function produces wrong range |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8198.965317539@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] random() function produces wrong range (Roland Roberts <roberts@panix.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: random() function produces wrong range
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Roland Roberts <roberts@panix.com> writes:
> Call random() several times and test the maximum value against your
> thresholds of 2^15 and 2^31. If random() is generating values in the
> range 1:2^31-1, you would expect half of your values to be greater
> than 2^15-1; more importantly, if you generate, say, 10 values, you
> expect only a 1:1024 chance that they are all below 2^15.
Actually the odds are far better than that. If the range is 2^31-1
then only about 2^-16th of the outputs should be less than 2^15.
So ten probes gives you a failure probability of about 2^-160 not
2^-10.
Generalizing, you could tell the difference between widths of 31,
47, or 63 bits with the same level of reliability.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: