Re: [PATCH] Fix segfault calling PQflush on invalid connection
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Fix segfault calling PQflush on invalid connection |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 819197.1660527847@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [PATCH] Fix segfault calling PQflush on invalid connection (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Fix segfault calling PQflush on invalid connection
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> writes:
> PQflush calls pqFlush, which performs struct access to the connection
> without checking if it's valid, resulting in a segfault if called with
> a null pointer.
> Please find attached a patch adding a guard to PQflush().
Seems reasonable, but this tickled a thought that's been in my
hindbrain for awhile: just checking for a null pointer is not
much of a check for being passed a valid PGconn pointer. Should
we add a magic number to struct PGconn, and modify all libpq's
entry points along the lines of
if (!conn || conn->magic != PGCONN_MAGIC)
return failure;
I'm honestly not entirely sure if this is worth the trouble;
I've not heard of many application bugs that this would've caught.
But the lack of any such check does seem like it's not up to
modern standards.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: