Re: MMAP Buffers
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MMAP Buffers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 814.1302966152@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: MMAP Buffers (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: MMAP Buffers
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> What he did, I gather, is treat the mmapped buffers as a read-only
> copy of the data. To actually make any modifications he copies it into
> shared buffers and treats them like normal. When the buffers get
> flushed from memory they get written and then the pointers get
> repointed back at the mmapped copy.
That seems much too late --- won't other processes still be looking at
the stale mmap'ed version of the page until a write-out happens?
I'm pretty concerned about the memory efficiency of this too, since it
seems like it's making it *guaranteed*, not just somewhat probable,
that there are two copies in RAM of every database page that's been
modified since the last checkpoint (or so).
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: