> On Oct 7, 2019, at 8:24 AM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 06:00:34PM +0100, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
>> On Sat, 2019-09-07 at 12:52 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>>> Will that combination be built ?
>>
>> No. RHEL 6 is too old to build many of the dependencies.
>
> What dependencies ? I built PG30/RH6 just now using:
> sudo yum install geos36-devel proj49-devel json-c12-devel gdal-devel hdf5-devel #
hdf5-devel-1.8.5.patch1-10.el6.x86_64
Maybe libprotobuf-c? But with improved detection added recently we should at least be able to build out support for
ST_AsMVTagainst older libprotobuf-c, and only miss out on ST_AsGeoBuf() which nobody uses anyways.
P
>
> $ rpm -q geos36-devel proj49-devel json-c-devel gdal-devel hdf5-devel
> geos36-devel-3.6.3-1.rhel6.1.x86_64
> proj49-devel-4.9.3-3.rhel6.1.x86_64
> json-c-devel-0.11-13.el6.x86_64
> gdal-devel-1.9.2-9.rhel6.x86_64
> hdf5-devel-1.8.5.patch1-10.el6.x86_64
>
> Also (I don't know why I didn't ask before) is postgis25 going to be built for
> centos6 ?
>
> See also:
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/2019-October/028110.html
>
> And commits yesterday from Paul, which I think(?) should allow compiling for
> RH6.
>
> Now that I've done it already, it seems to me that if these won't be available
> on PGDG, I'm likely to compile them locally to allow upgrading to PG12 within a
> month rather than over many months. I guess I'd have to do it for PG11, since
> they're already available for PG12.
>
> Justin
>
>