Re: apparent RI bug
| От | chester c young |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: apparent RI bug |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 811324.18014.qm@web54305.mail.re2.yahoo.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: apparent RI bug (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: apparent RI bug
|
| Список | pgsql-sql |
--- Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com> wrote:
> Is it possible you ever had a before delete trigger that just did a
> return
> NULL rather than raising an exception? IIRC, explicitly telling the
> system to ignore the delete will work on the referential actions.
yes, it is possible, for example, a function without a body or without
a "return old".
are you saying this would override the RI constraint? if so, is this
by design?
____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: