Re: Vacuum looping?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Vacuum looping?
Дата
Msg-id 8112.1185633427@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Vacuum looping?  ("Steven Flatt" <steven.flatt@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
"Steven Flatt" <steven.flatt@gmail.com> writes:
> The vacuum then just sat there.  What I can't understand is why it went back
> for a second pass of the pkey index?  There was nothing writing to the table
> once the vacuum began.  Is this behaviour expected?

Yes (hint: the numbers tell me what your maintenance_work_mem setting is).
You should have left it alone, probably, though there seems to be
something funny about your foo_1 index --- why was that so much slower
than the others for the first pass?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tilmann Singer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Slow query with backwards index scan
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum looping?