Re: What object types should be in schemas?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: What object types should be in schemas?
Дата
Msg-id 80f80f9d-a99e-d02d-47fc-09672fb15d32@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: What object types should be in schemas?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 12.01.23 18:41, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think one important criterion to think about is how does encryption work
> when you have per-customer (or per-whatever) schemas.  Is the concept of
> a column encryption [objtype] a thing that you would like to set up per
> customer?  In that case, you will probably want that object to live in
> that customer's schema.  Otherwise, you'll force the DBA to come up with
> a naming scheme that includes the customer name in the column encryption
> object.

Makes sense.  In my latest patch I have moved these key objects into 
schemas.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Rename contrib module basic_archive to basic_wal_module
Следующее
От: Christoph Moench-Tegeder
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade from PG-14.5 to PG-15.1 failing due to non-existing function