Re: Bug in move 0
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug in move 0 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8087.960695545@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug in move 0
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I just sent off an email stating that MOVE 0 goes to the end, and that
> the FETCH manual page says:
> Postgres does not currently support this notion; in
> fact the value zero is reserved to indicate that
> all rows should be retrieved and is equivalent to
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> specifying the ALL keyword. If the RELATIVE key-
> word has been used, the Postgres assumes that the
> user intended SQL92 behavior and returns this error
> message.
> So it seems we are OK.
We may have documented the behavior, but that doesn't make it right ;-)
If someone were to submit a patch to change MOVE 0 into a no-op
(without breaking MOVE ALL of course), I'd vote to apply it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: