Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8049.1143815780@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Problem for indexes only. heap xlrecs don't specify exact insert points
Sure they do. They had better, else (for example) the associated index
insertions will be wrong.
> Accesses to local buffers don't need to be critical sections either.
True, but in most places it would uglify the code quite a bit to make it
like that, because START/END_CRIT_SECTION are bracketing code that is
shared between both cases. And I'm not seeing where we'd get any
particular reliability gain from it: if the code has any significant
risk of elog'ing during the critical section, it's broken anyway ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: