which schema to install contrib modules
| От | Paul Silveira |
|---|---|
| Тема | which schema to install contrib modules |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8024340.post@talk.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hello, I was wonding what the community's opinion was on which schema the contrib modules should be installed into. I intend on using DBLink, tsearch2, and xml2 and have initially installed them in the public schema. That will work but it really clutters that schema and I was also intending on using that for my application as well. Is there any value to creating a "contrib" schema and installing them there and then just referencing them via the contrib.<FUNCTION> convention? I was also thinking that I could just change my postgresql.conf file to have my schema order read $user, public, contrib. Is it more valuable to just move my application into it's own schema and leaving the contribs in the public schema? Thoughts? Paul -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/which-schema-to-install-contrib-modules-tf2870947.html#a8024340 Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: