Re: Bug in move 0

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> If I remember correctly *move 0* means *move all* in the
> implementation of cursor.

It does (I looked at it before).

> I don't know if it's the spec or not.

As best I can tell from SQL92, FETCH RELATIVE 0 implies no movement
(refetch same row).  MOVE is not in the spec but it seems it ought
to behave like that too.

The fix seemed too extensive to be making in the last days of 7.0
beta, so I let it go at the time --- but someone should fix this.

            regards, tom lane