Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От les@Mars.mcs.net (Leslie Mikesell)
Тема Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
Дата
Msg-id 7s6sae$2evg$1@Mars.mcs.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
In article <199909201327.JAA18590@candle.pha.pa.us>,
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
>> 
>> > I am told we are the same as Ingres, and slower than Oracle with no -F,
>> > and faster than Oracle with -F.
>> 
>> What is "-F"?
>> 
>
>-F is postgres option for no-fsync.

Does that matter on read-only selects?

Might some future version of postgresql have an option to turn
off transaction support to match mysql speed for the situations
where that is more important than the ability to roll back?
 Les Mikesell  les@mcs.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: postmaster disappears