Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7e0e289f-c92d-40cc-bf46-162d484a5df4@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 8/26/24 14:49, nikhil raj wrote: > Hi All, > > I've encountered a noticeable difference in execution time and query > execution plan row counts between PostgreSQL 13 and PostgreSQL 16 when > running a query on |information_schema| tables. Surprisingly, PostgreSQL > 16 is performing slower than PostgreSQL 13. Did you run ANALYZE on the Postgres 16 instance? > *4PostgreSQL 13.14 (PostgreSQL 13.14 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by > gcc 11.4.0, 64-bit)* > Execution plan: PG13.14 Execution Plan > <https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/ag1a62a9d47dg29d> > > *PostgreSQL 16.4 (PostgreSQL 16.4 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by > gcc 11.4.0, 64-bit)* > Execution plan: PG16.4 Execution Plan > <https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/4c66fdfbf2hf9ed2> Use: https://explain.depesz.com/ It is easier to follow it's output. > > > Has anyone else experienced similar behavior or could provide insights > into why PostgreSQL 16 might be slower for this query? Any advice or > suggestions for optimization would be greatly appreciated. Yes when ANALYZE was not run on a new instance. > > Thank you! > > NOTE:- PFA the raw file of explain and analyze below. > > > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: