Re: Improving the memory allocator

 On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:25:10 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:59:45 PM Radosław Smogura wrote:
>>  I didn't followed this topic carefully, so sorry If I wrote 
>> something
>>  that was written, but I thought about following approach at least 
>> for
>>  message sending, etc.:
>>
>>  1. When initializing MemoryContext (pool) give one parameter that 
>> will
>>  be stack size. Stack is addition to normal operations.
> You can't allocate memory on the stack and return that.
>
> Andres
I didn't wrote allocate on stack. I thought about preallocate n bytes chunk for stack-like memory but without popping.
Regards,Radek