Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Kellerer
Тема Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL?
Дата
Msg-id 7d39e5cf-95d2-2101-9a2d-aa31e48f2494@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Where **not** to use PostgreSQL?  (Thomas Güttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de>)
Список pgsql-general
Thomas Güttler schrieb am 28.02.2019 um 12:47:
> where would you suggest someone to **not** use PostgreSQL?
> 
> Why would you do this?
> 
> What alternative would you suggest instead?

Due to the MVCC implementation, I would hesitate to use Postgres in environments that have an extremely high and
constantrate of DELETE an UPDATE statements, e.g. several thousands or even tens of thousands transactions per second
withoutany "quiet" times where vacuum could "catch up" clean out dead tuples. 
 

Tuning autovacuum to cope with that is very challenging 
(at least until the new UNDO log implementation is ready ;) 






В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Perumal Raj
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X
Следующее
От: Nicola Contu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2