Re: When IMMUTABLE is not.
| От | chap@anastigmatix.net |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: When IMMUTABLE is not. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7d1504b9211a5c153491761f3d82ae53@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: When IMMUTABLE is not. ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-06-15 10:19, David G. Johnston wrote: > The failure to find and execute the function code itself is not a > failure > mode that these markers need be concerned with. Assuming one can > execute > the function an immutable function will give the same answer for the > same > input for all time. That was the view I ultimately took, and just made PL/Java suppress that SPI readonly flag when going to look for the function code. Until that change, you could run into the not-uncommon situation where you've just loaded a jar of new functions and try to use them in the same transaction, and hey presto, the VOLATILE ones all work, and the IMMUTABLE ones aren't there yet. Regards, -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: