Re: Domains vs data types
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Domains vs data types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7cdd7a73-5a61-451b-9556-5cb523cfb239@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Domains vs data types (Ertan Küçükoglu <ertan.kucukoglu@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Domains vs data types
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 8/19/25 21:47, Ertan Küçükoglu wrote: > Hello, > > I am using PostgreSQL 17.6. > I would like to learn if there is any benefit of using domains over data > types for table column definitions in terms of performance gain/loss. > > For example I might have table defined as below > create table test ( > a integer, > b integer, > c integer, > d varchar(5) > ); > > I might also have ame table defined as below > > create domain aint integer; > create domain s5 varchar(5); > > create table test_domain ( > a aint, > b aint, > c aint, > d s5 > ); > > Does the second table have any technical advantage/disadvantage over > plain data type definition? > Less metadata in memory? High metadata in memory? Less/increased disk space? See: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/catalog-pg-type.html for what is stored in system catalog for a domain vs a base type. Personally I don't see that integer --> aint really helps. Also I am pretty sure varchar(5) --> s5 is still going to result in a length check. > > Thanks & Regards, > Ertan -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: