Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jonathan S. Katz
Тема Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Дата
Msg-id 7c9a902b-2465-a2fd-395a-59f4eba212de@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2/16/19 4:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera
>>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
>>>>> light vote for MATERIALIZED.  It reads easier, seems more grammatically
>>>>> correct, and uses an existing word.
>
>>>> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in
>>>> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql
>
>>> Seconded!
>
>> +1 to MATERIALIZED too
>
> I was expecting more controversy ... pushed that way.

This is awesome. Thank you everyone for working on this!


Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Synchronize with imath upstream