Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7c1eeafb-2375-4ff6-8469-0640d52d44ed@vondra.me обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more) Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I've finally pushed this, after many rounds of careful testing to ensure no regressions, and polishing. All changes since the version shared on September 13 are only cosmetic - renaming a macro to keep it consistent with the other ones, clarifying a couple comments etc. Nothing major. I ended up squashing the two parts into a single commit. I thought about keeping the two steps, but it seemed pointless - the first part inflated the PGPROC struct, which I didn't like to commit, even if only as an intermediate WIP state. So far buildfarm didn't blew up, so let's hope it will stay that way. I just realized there's no CF entry for this - sorry about that :-( I started the thread a year ago to discuss an experimental patche, and it never made it to CFA. But there was a discussion spanning a year, so hopefully that's enough. regards -- Tomas Vondra
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: