Re: Choosing default collation/ctype

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: Choosing default collation/ctype
Дата
Msg-id 7a6954c2dfe3f224b4c45aa59f7fb6e951ce93b0.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение
Ответ на Re: Choosing default collation/ctype  ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>)
Ответы Re: Choosing default collation/ctype
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, 2026-05-05 at 13:16 +0200, Daniel Verite wrote:
> Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> > > So if you target Postgres 17+, C.UTF-8 from the builtin provider is
> > > a better choice for UTF-8 databases than "C" .
> >
> > Yes, "builtin" and the "C" collation is the best default value.
>
> But my point was that, no, it's not.
> Let's show a concrete example with Postgres 18:
>
> [...]
>
> It is not the correct uppercasing.

That is true.
But if you are using "C.UTF-8", the semantics of upper() can change
between versions, if Unicode is upgraded.  That bears a residual risk
of OS upgrades breaking indexes on upper(col).

I'd say that the small benefit of better case conversion isn't worth
the risk.  I'd chose "C", and use a natural language collation explicitly
on columns where these things matter.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: