Re: Replacing the pg_get_expr security hack with a datatype solution

On Aug 21, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Aug 21, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> We agreed that we ought to do $SUBJECT in 9.1.
>
>> One argument against this is that it might cause the current fix to get less testing.
>
> Less testing than what?

Is this a smart remark? Less testing than it otherwise would, obviously.

...Robert