Re: NVL vs COALESCE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Glaesemann
Тема Re: NVL vs COALESCE
Дата
Msg-id 7DF53811-C757-4F1C-9FFE-44D227AF3CD2@myrealbox.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на NVL vs COALESCE  (Marcus Engene <mengpg@engene.se>)
Ответы Re: NVL vs COALESCE  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Re: NVL vs COALESCE  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Nov 24, 2005, at 21:21 , Marcus Engene wrote:

> When we're having an alias discussion, I'd really like to see NVL  
> in postgres. Not because of porting from oracle as much as just  
> spelling that without the reference manual is completely impossible.

NVL: what a very unfortunate spelling. (NULL VaLue? NULL Valued  
Logic? Named Very Loosely? Someone help me here :) ) AFAICT, COALESCE  
is SQL standard, while NVL isn't. I think an index entry might be a  
good idea.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marcus Engene
Дата:
Сообщение: NVL vs COALESCE
Следующее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NVL vs COALESCE