Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Yen
Тема Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?
Дата
Msg-id 7D750FF9-530C-4179-99A4-702AB1E5B253@iparadigms.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Ответы Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> Richard Yen <richyen@iparadigms.com> wrote:
>
>> there were moments where 129 WAL files were generated in one
>> minute.  Is it plausible that this autovacuum could be responsible
>> for this?
>
> I don't remember seeing your autovacuum and vacuum config settings,
> or an answer to my question about whether there was a bulk load of a
> significant portion of current data.  With agressive autovacuum
> settings, hitting the freeze threshold for bulk-loaded data could do
> that.
>

Yeah, autovacuum is pretty aggressive, as I recall:
autovacuum = on
log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0
autovacuum_max_workers = 8
autovacuum_naptime = 1min
autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 400
autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 200
autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2
autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1
autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 200000000
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 0
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1

vacuum_cost_delay = 0
vacuum_cost_limit = 200

When you say "bulk-loaded," I suppose that also includes loading the data via slony ADD NODE as well--correct?  I
createdthis node maybe 6 months ago via slony ADD NODE 

Thanks much for your time,
--Richard

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Yen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?