> On Mar 21, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/20/20 8:13 PM, pabloa98 wrote:
>> Nothing I saw that said int could not become bigint.
>> My bad. The code cannot be a bigint. Or it could be a bigint between 1 to 99999999 :)
>
>
> Aah, that was the counter Peter was talking about. I missed that.
>
> As to below that is going to require more thought.
>
Still no word on the actual requirement. As someone who believes consecutive numbers on digital invoices is simply a
mistakeninterpretation of the paper based system, I suspect a similar error here. But again we haven’t really heard,
faras I know. Something really fishy about 99999999.
>