Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter

From: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>
> On Mon, Dec  2, 2013 at 10:22:47PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
>> So, my suggestion is to just add the following sentence right after
>> the above one.
>>
>> The Postgres style is an exception: the output of the date type is
>> either MM-DD-YYYY (e.g. 12-17-1997) or DD-MM-YYYY (e.g. 17-12-1997),
>> which is different from the date part of the output of the timestamp
>> type.
>>
>> Could you consider and add this to the manual?
>
> Yes, I will make the change unless someone objects.

Could you commit this if you feel okay?  I'm sorry if I missed the modified 
article in the devel doc.

Regards
MauMau