Re: Very slow updates when using IN syntax subselect

Bryce Nesbitt <bryce1@obviously.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What does EXPLAIN show for this and for the base query?      
>    ->  Seq Scan on event  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=408)
>          Filter: (reconciled = false)

> select count(*) from event;
> -----------
>  116226

It seems pretty clear that you've never vacuumed nor analyzed these
tables ... else the planner would have some clue about their sizes.
Do that and then see what you get.
        regards, tom lane