contrib/rtree_gist into core system?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема contrib/rtree_gist into core system?
Дата
Msg-id 7966.1119794626@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: contrib/rtree_gist into core system?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Re: contrib/rtree_gist into core system?  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I've mentioned this a couple times now, but here is an official
proposal:

I would like to move the contrib/rtree_gist functionality into the core
system before feature freeze.  There are a couple arguments in favor:

* It's way past time GiST indexes got some regression testing in the
core build.  rtree_gist is the only very plausible candidate for
near-term integration: I don't think tsearch2 is ready for that, and
the other GiST-using contrib modules are not of sufficient general
usefulness.

* With the recent WAL-ization and hoped-for concurrency fixes, GiST
is definitely superior to R-tree for practical use.  I don't see the
percentage in continuing to maintain the R-tree code indefinitely.
By integrating the opclasses needed to replace R-tree, we can start
down the path to deprecating and eventually removing R-tree.

Any objections?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: tsearch2 changes need backpatching?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tsearch2 changes need backpatching?