Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7939.1188749479@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings
Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> On 9/2/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Seems a little verbose, but maybe we could do "SET var FROM CURRENT"
>> or "SET var FROM SESSION"?
> I'd prefer FROM SESSION then. FROM CURRENT seems unclear.
Actually, I think FROM SESSION is unclear, as it opens the question
whether the value to be applied is the session-wide setting or the
currently active one. Inside a transaction that has done SET LOCAL,
these are different things.
I think we pretty clearly want to have it take the currently active
setting, and I'd vote for FROM CURRENT as the best way of expressing
that.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: