Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes:
> OK. Looks better. But nentries should be bogus a little now?
No, I think it's fine as is. Essentially this logic says "attempt to
split when the new insertion would make us go over the target fill
factor", whereas the old logic split when the just-completed insertion
reached the target. There's not a lot of reason to care about the
precise boundary anyway, but to the extent that you believe that the
target is exact, I think this behavior is actually a bit more precise.
regards, tom lane