Re: large object implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: large object implementation
Дата
Msg-id 7913.992328204@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на large object implementation  ("Andy Samuel" <andysamuel@geocities.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Andy Samuel" <andysamuel@geocities.com> writes:
> I wonder why all large objects is placed in one system table
>  pg_largeobject ).

Why not?  There's no tight limit on the size of a table.

> I just want to trow an idea, why not create a similiar table and added pglo
> ( something like pglo_tablename ).
> This way, the large objects will be spread in every table that has the blob
> type.

But large objects aren't blobs, if by blob you mean something that's
tied to a single table.  There's not a way to associate a large object
with a particular table.  Besides which, we already have TOAST, which
seems to do what you're thinking of.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Calling lo_open within user defined C function
Следующее
От: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Дата:
Сообщение: AW: Postgres Replication