Re: VLDB Features
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VLDB Features |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7907.1197704696@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: VLDB Features (NikhilS <nikkhils@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: VLDB Features
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
NikhilS <nikkhils@gmail.com> writes:
> Any errors which occur before doing the heap_insert should not require
> any recovery according to me.
A sufficient (though far from all-encompassing) rejoinder to that is
"triggers and CHECK constraints can do anything".
> The overhead of having a subtransaction per row is a very valid concern. But
> instead of using a per insert or a batch insert substraction, I am
> thinking that we can start off a subtraction and continue it till we
> encounter a failure.
What of failures that occur only at (sub)transaction commit, such as
foreign key checks?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: