Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config
Дата
Msg-id 7900.1427231875@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Ответы Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Michael" == Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>  Michael> Well, my point is to have something on which you can directly
>  Michael> apply maths on without changing its shape ;)

> There's this trick:

> # if version < 9.1 ...
> ifeq ($(filter-out 7.% 8.% 9.0, $(MAJORVERSION)),)
> # stuff
> endif

> # if version >= 9.3
> ifneq ($(filter-out 7.% 8.% 9.0 9.1 9.2, $(MAJORVERSION)),)
> # stuff
> endif

That's pretty ugly :-(.  I concur with Michael that there's value in
exposing the version number in the numeric form used by PG_VERSION_NUM.
However, I also concur with Andrew that if the use-case for this is
Makefiles, pg_config is a pretty poor transmission mechanism.
We should instead add PG_VERSION_NUM to the version variables set in
Makefile.global.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX
Следующее
От: "Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float)