Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7883.1333467500@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de> wrote:
>> I completely agree. Assertions helped a lot dealing with concurrent
>> code. How do you want to tackle this for now? Want me to create a
>> separate header pg_assert.h as part of my patch? Or is it okay to
>> factor it out later and include it from the general header then?
> I'll just go do it, barring objections.
If the necessary support code isn't going to be available *everywhere*,
it should not be in postgres.h. So I did not care for your proposal to
put it in dumputils.
Possibly we could move assert.c into src/port/ and make it part of
libpgport?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: