Physical column size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Paul Mackay
Тема Physical column size
Дата
Msg-id 786c2f6d0601260206k2201a548p48af7c7fc085d3b2@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Physical column size  (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hi,

I've created a table like this :
CREATE TABLE tmp_A (
c "char",
i int4
);

And another one
CREATE TABLE tmp_B (
i int4,
ii int4
);

I then inerted a bit more than 19 million rows in each table (exactly the same number of rows in each).

The end result is that the physical size on disk used by table tmp_A is exactly the same as table tmp_B (as revealed by the pg_relation_size function) ! Given that a "char" field is supposed to be 1 byte in size and a int4 4 bytes, shouldn't the tmp_A use a smaller disk space ? Or is it that any value, whatever the type, requires at least 4 bytes to be stored ?

Thanks,
Paul

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Lor
Дата:
Сообщение: PostgreSQL Solaris packages now in beta
Следующее
От: Mario Weilguni
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Physical column size