Re: [PORTS] Re: [GENERAL] Backend cache invalidation initialization failed... HUH?

> there is some bug in the display procedure for int8, rather than an
> internal problem. Is this true for all ports? Just for Solaris? Just
> for Solaris 2.5.1? In any case, a fix is required. Maybe added to
> 6.4.1?

Can you determine the appropriate character(s) in a printf()
specification for int8 on your version of Solaris? We are currently
using the HAVE_LONG_INT_64 and HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 to determine this,
and depending on the values of those we are using either "%ld" or "%lld"
for the printf() and scanf(). A few other platforms support additional,
alternate specification (I recall "%qd" but might be mistaken).

Marc, what do you see on your Solaris 2.6 box?

                    - Tom

#ifdef HAVE_LONG_INT_64
/* Plain "long int" fits, use it */
typedef long int int64;

#define INT64_FORMAT "%ld"
#else
#ifdef HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64
/* We have working support for "long long int", use that */
typedef long long int int64;

#define INT64_FORMAT "%lld"
#else
/* Fall back to long int so that int8.c compiles */
typedef long int int64;

#define INT64_FORMAT "%ld"
#define INT64_IS_BUSTED
#endif
#endif