Re: Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7796.1444168429@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> From looking at the code, it appears to me that if the Execute is run
> to completion, then its results will be seen by future statements, but
> if the portal is closed earlier, then not. See the end of
> exec_execute_message. The handler for the Close message (inside
> PostgresMain) doesn't seem to do anything that would result in a
> CommandCounterIncrement() or CommitTransactionCommand().
> This does seem a little strange.
I dunno, if you close a portal before you've gotten CommandComplete,
should you expect that all its actions were taken? Arguably, that
should be more like a ROLLBACK.
Note there'd only be a difference in case of an operation with RETURNING,
else there's no way (at this level anyway) to pause a data-modifying
command mid-execution. This logic all predates RETURNING, I think,
so maybe it does need to be revisited. But it's not entirely clear
what should happen.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: