Re: Error-safe user functions

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2022-12-08 Th 21:59, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, I was planning to take a look at that before walking away from
>> this stuff.  (I'm sure not volunteering to convert ALL the input
>> functions, but I'll do the datetime code.)

> Awesome. Perhaps if there are no more comments you can commit what you
> currently have so people can start work on other input functions.

Pushed.  As I said, I'll take a look at the datetime area.  Do we
have any volunteers for other input functions?

            regards, tom lane