Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Lamb
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
Дата
Msg-id 7779142C-B027-4C17-A67C-A7C220AADF80@slamb.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid  (Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On May 9, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Of course not, but which drives lie about sync that are SATA? Or
> more specifically SATA-II?

I don't know the answer to this question, but have you seen this tool?

     http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html

It attempts to experimentally determine if, with your operating
system version, controller, and hard disk, fsync() does as claimed.
Of course, experimentation can't prove the system is correct, but it
can sometimes prove the system is broken.

I say it's worth running on any new model of disk, any new
controller, or after the Linux kernel people rewrite everything (i.e.
on every point release).

I have to admit to hypocrisy, though...I'm running with systems that
other people ordered and installed, I doubt they were this thorough,
and I don't have identical hardware to run tests on. So no real way
to do this.

Regards,
Scott

--
Scott Lamb <http://www.slamb.org/>



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Slow C Function
Следующее
От: Alan Hodgson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: VACUUM killing my CPU