Re: Current enums patch

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> If you want to review or test the feature, the attached patch can be
> used as a replacement for the portion that affects parse_coerce.c, and
> with this it compiles and passes regression. I think it's correct but it
> should still be OKed by at least one Tom. :-)

Since Neil seems to have dropped the ball on this, I'm going to pick it
up and review/apply it.  I need a break from thinking about HOT and
other bizarre schemes ;-)

Barring objection from Tom D, I'll start with this version.

            regards, tom lane