Jeremy Schneider <schnjere@amazon.com> writes:
> Nonetheless, in the process of troubleshooting it occurred to me that
> this error message would be more useful in general if it included the
> base relation OID in the error message. Amit suggested a separate thread
> - so here we are. :)
> Anyone have thoughts? Would I need a commitfest entry to propose a
> two-line tweak like this?
Probably not, unless it slips through the cracks. But I wonder why
print the parent's OID, when we have access to its name.
regards, tom lane