Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 771900.1727499306@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:39 AM David G. Johnston < > david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Friday, September 27, 2024, Durgamahesh Manne < >>> Can't we use primary key on singal column(betid) on partitioned table >>> rather than using composite key (placedon,betid)? >> No. It would be misleading to allow such a thing because a unique index >> can only span a single partition. > That is IMO a serious (and probably unfixable, given how PG stores tables) > flaw in PG's partitioning design. You can call it a flaw if you want, but it's an intentional design limitation. The only way to relax it would be to invent global indexes (that is, single indexes covering the entire partitioning tree), which would basically throw away every advantage of making a partitioned structure in the first place. If that's what you want, don't partition your table. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: