Re: Improving count(*)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Improving count(*) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7711.1132338904@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Improving count(*) (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Improving count(*)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
> Might it be possible to apply rule-style rewriting to a clause of an
> ordinary select query? That is, is it prohibitively expensive to get PG
> to recognise
> SELECT count(*) FROM big_table
> and replace it with
> SELECT sum(summary_count) FROM my_materialised_view
> This should allow you to have where-clauses and apply to a range of
> cases. What I fear is that checking to see if the rule applies will cost
> too much on all those queries where it doesn't apply.
There is already code in the optimizer that does similar rewriting
for min/max queries. However, that's a hard-wired transformation.
I don't see any very simple way to provide a user-configurable
equivalent.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: