Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7708.1011997574@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects (Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> writes:
> Specifically to the question of schema pathing, why would you want it to
> be session-settable? Either your DB app is designed to work w/ schemas, or
> it isn't.
So that you can set the correct mode for your client application. It is
silly to suppose that an installation-wide or even database-wide setting
is sufficient. Consider for example a database shared by multiple
pieces of client software; wouldn't you like to be able to upgrade them
to schema-awareness one at a time?
You could possibly make a case for a single setting per user, but even
that makes an assumption (user == client software) that I think is not
reasonable for us to force on all Postgres installations.
Basically I haven't got a lot of patience for arguments that say we do
not need flexibility. There are more people out there, using Postgres
in more different ways, than either you or I know about.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: